What Do You Think About This?...
First Chinese Were Black
by Clyde Winters
In accordance with the oral traditions of China, the founders of
Chinese civilization were Huangdi and Fu Xi. These legendary rulers like
Dai Hao, were all buried in zhiu (burial mounds). The presence of this
mound culture in China supports the traditions of burial of elects in
mound tombs.
The skeletal remains from southern China are predominately negroid. (Chang 1964, p.370) The people practiced single burials.
In northern China the blacks founded many civilizations. The
three major empires of China were the Xia Dynasty (c.2205-1766 B.C),
Shang/ Yin Dynasty (c.1700-1050 B.C) and the Zhou Dynasty.The Zhou
dynasty was the first dynasty founded by the Mongoloid people in China
called Hua (Who-aa).
The founders of Xia and Shang came from the Fertile African
Crescent by way of Iran. According to Chinese legends the first man Pan
Gu, used a hammer 18,000 years ago to make man.
The Chinese legends designate various culture heroes as the
inventors of various aspects of Chinese civilization. The Chinese term
for emperor is Di. Huang Di (Yellow Emperor), is the Chinese culture
hero credited with introducing boats, carts 'chariots, the bow and
arrow, ceramics, wooded houses and writing.
Chinese civilization began along the Yellow river . Here the soil
was fertile and black Chinese farmers grew millet 4000 years ago, and
later soybeans. They also raised pigs and cattle. By 3500 B.C., the
blacks in China were
raising silkworms and making silk.
The culture hero Huang Di is a direct link of Africa. His name
was pronounced in old Chinese Yuhai Huandi or Hu Nak Kunte. He was
supposed to have arrived in China from the west in 2282 B.C., and
settled along the banks of the Loh river in Shanxi. This transliteration
of Huandgi, to Hu Nak Kunte is interesting because Kunte is a common
clan name among the Manding speakers.
The Africans or blacks that founded civilization in China were
often called li min "black headed people" by the Zhou dynasts. This term
has affinity to the Sumero-Akkadian term sag- gig-ga "black headed
people". These li min are associated with the Chinese cultural hero Yao.
In the Annals of the Bamboo Books, we learn that Yao devised a
calendar to help regulate agrarian work through proper use of ritual and
music and created a rudimentary government. The Annals of the Bamboo
Books, makes it clear that Yao "he united and harmonized the myriad
states [of his dominion], and the [li min] black headed
people were
reformed by his cordial agreement".
We also read that Shun, the successor of Yao, distinguished by
his reputation as an obedient devoted son, noted to : "Ki [that] the
Black headed people are suffering the distress of hunger". To help
relieve the people Shun gave his throne over to Yu, the founder of the
Shang Dynasty. Yu, in the Annals of the Bamboo Books, is reported to
have noted that "...when a sovereign gives response to the people, he is
kind, and the Black headed people cherish him in their heart".
We know very little about the sounds of ancient Chinese because
Ancient Chinese was different from Old Chinese and Middle Chinese and
the modern Chinese dialects. (Ramsey 1987, pp.137-138) This results from
the fact that the Chinese dynasties were founded by diverse ethnic
groups e.g., Xia and Shang li (i.e., Black Shang) were founded by
Dravidian and Manding speakers. Shang-Yin was founded by classical
mongoloids, and the Zhou by the contemporary Chinese. ) This explains
the difference in pronunciation for Ancient Chinese spoken by the Xia
and Shang peoples and Old and Middle Chinese or a variant there of,
which was probably spoken by the Zhou people.
The Shang characters compare favorably to the ancient Proto-
Saharan script used by the Harappans in the Indus Valley and the Manding
script used in the ancient Sahara and Crete . Winters (1985c) outlined
the spread of the Proto-Saharan script to Harappa, and throughout
Saharan Africa and Asia by the Dravidians and Manding.
Evidence of Chinese writing first appears around 2000 B.C. as
pottery marks. The shell-and-bone characters represented writing they
were not pictures. The Shang symbols compare favorably with ancient
Manding symbols. Although their are different contemporary
pronunciations for these symbols they have the same meaning and shape.
This suggest a genetic relationship between these scripts because we
know that the present pronunciation of the Chinese symbols probably has
little relationship to the ancient pronunciation of Chinese spoken in
Xia and Shang times when these characters were first used. This
cognation of scripts supports the proposed Dravidian and Manding
migration and settlement of ancient China during Xia times.
The identification of the first hero of China, Hu Nak Kunte as a
member of the Kunte clan of the Manding speakers of Africa is supported
by the close relationship between the Manding languages and Chinese.
Even though we do not know the ancient pronunciation of many Chinese
signs many Chinese and Manding words share analogy and suggest a Manding
substratum for Chinese.
Chinese and Manding share many typological features. These
features include reduplication for emphasis and the use of suffixes to
form words.
In Chinese the -zi suffix, is joined to many nouns e.g., 0 qizi #
'wife'; 0 tizi # 'ladder'; and 0 jinzi # 'gold'. This -zi, suffix
corresponds to the Manding use of si 'that, that one,those' e.g., kye si
'that man'.
The suffix -tou is used to form place words e.g., 0 litou #
'inside' and 0 qiantou # 'front'. In Manding the word for place was -ta.
The Chinese -r suffix is used to form nouns e.g., 0 hua # 'to
paint' and 0 huar # 'picture'. This corresponds to the Manding suffix
-ra which transforms verbs into nouns, e.g., 0 kyi # 'to send' and 0
kyira # 'messenger'.
There is also some analogy between Chinese and Manding pronouns:
Language I You he,she
Chinese wo ni ta
Manding ne ni, i a
These languages also share the interogative pronouns:
Chinese English Manding
0 ho # who,which,what 0 o #
In addition to cognate writing and grammatical features the
Chinese and Manding share many lexical items. Below we compare Chinese
and Manding terms. The Chinese terms are written in the Pinyin (phonetic
alphabet) which is popular in China today.
There are numerous examples of phonetic correspondence between Chinese and Manding.
d=/=t
Chinese English Manding
di bend down ti 'negation suffix
da to cut down,destroy te 'negative particle'
dai to alter ta 'to put in'
du rot toli
da hill, hillock te-mbo
di Supreme Ruler tigi
d=/=d
da great,noble dya, da
di child di
da big dya,di 'several'
b=/=b
bu 'negative' bu 'to be in decrease
bo to break bo, bu 'to give a blow
ban great ba
b=/=p
bi to press,make impression pe
bai white, clean po
d=/=b
do cut bo, bu
h=/=o
ho 'everywhere' o 'void'
ho who,which,where o
f=/=f
fa 'kill' fe 'to be void'
s=/=s
shan 'mountain sande 'the sky region near water'
sa loose sa 'to die'
su 'to pound' --- su 'to mix'
su to suck susu
k=/=k
kan stem ka, kala
ku to cut open,rip up kulo 'to soften'
y=/=y
yu abundant,excessive yo 'perfect'
w=/=w
wa hollow wo
n=/=m
nu women musu
mu eye nya
ma mother na
o=/=o
do cut bo
bo 'break' ---- bo 'to five a blow'
rou flesh soro
a=/=a
da big dya
da great da
sa 'to loose' --- sa 'to die'
ban great ba
ma mother ma
o=/=u
so to grind su
yu 'abundant' --- yo 'perfect'
du rot toli
do cut bu
i=/=i
niu cow ni
xin 'heart' --- si 'breast'
di child di
iu give di
a=/=e
da 'to destroy' te 'negative particle'
tien cultivated field de-n
u=/=u
bu 'negative' bu 'to be decreased'
nu woman musu
du earth dugu
lu house lu
Above we have compared forty-six cognate Chinese and Manding
terms. These terms can be divided into three sets of cognate items, (1)
words in both languages with equivalent meanings with full
correspondence, (2) words with consonants showing assimilation and (3)
words with equivalent meanings but lacking similar phonetic values.
Using this criteria we find that the cognate rate for corresponding
Chinese and Manding terms are the following percentages 54% of the terms
show full correspondence; 30 % show cognate terms with alternating
consonants e.g., d=/=t, p=/=b , and etc.; and 15 percent of these terms
are unrelated.
The analogy between the Manding and Chinese languages suggest
that Manding is a substratum of Chinese. This also supports the view
that some early rulers of China came from the Kunte clan and were
Manding speakers.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allan, S , "Sons of Suns:Myth and Totemism in Early China", Bulletin
of the School of Oriental and African Studies (BSOAS) XLIV,(1981) pages
290-326.
Allan, S , "Drought, Human Sacrifice and the Mandate of Heaven in
a Lost Text from the Shang Shu", BSOAS XLVII, (1984) pages 523-535.
An Jinhuai, "In Search of China's Oldest Capital", China Pictorial, (1986) pages 39-41.
An Jinhuai, "The Shang City at Cheng-chou and related Problems",
In Studies of Shang Archaeology, (New Haven: Yale University Press,
1986) pages 15-48.
Chang, K C , "Prehistory and Early Historic Culture Horizon and Traditions in South China", Current Anthropology 5, no5
Chang, K C , The Archaeology of Ancient China, New Haven:Yale (1964), pages 359-375.
Chang, K C , Shang Civilization, New Haven:Yale University Press,1980.
Chang, K.C. The Archaeology of Ancient China, New Haven:Yale University Press, 1987.
Lacouperie, T de , The Languages of China before the Chinese, London:David Nutt, 1887.
Lacouperie, T de, "Origin from Babylon and Elam of the Early
Chinese Civilization:A summary of the Proofs", Babylonian and Oriental
Record 3, no5 (1889), pages 97-110
Ling Shun-Sheng , A Study of the Raft, Outrigger, Double and Deck
Canoes of ancient China, the Pacific and the Indian Ocean,
Taipei:Nankang, 1970.
Winters, Clyde Ahmad, "A Note on the Unity of Black Civilizations
in Africa, IndoChina, and China",PISAS 1979, Hong Kong :Asian Research
Service,1980b.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Are Dravidians of African Origin", P.Second
ISAS,1980,( Hong Kong:Asian Research Service, 1981b) pages 789- 807.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Further Thoughts on Japanese Dravidian
Connection",Dravidian Language Association News 5, no9 (1981c) pages
1-4.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Blacks in Ancient China,Part 1:The Founders of Xia and Shang", Journal of Black Studies 1,no2 (1983c).
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Possible Relationship between the Manding
and Japanese", Papers in Japanese Linguistics 9, (1983d) pages 151-158.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Further Notes on Japanese and Tamil"
,International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 13, no2 (June 1984c)
pages 347-353.
Winters, Clyde Ahmad, "The Indus Valley Writing and related
Scripts of the 3rd Millennium BC", India Past and Present 2, no1 (
1985b), pages 13-19.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "The Far Eastern Origin of the Tamils", Journal of Tamil Studies , no27 (June 1985c), pages 65-92.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Dravidian Settlements in ancient Polynesia", India Past and Present 3, no2 (1986c)pages 225- 241.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad Winters ,"The Dravidian Origin of the
Mountain and Water Toponyms in central Asia", Journal of Central Asia 9,
no2 (1986d), pages 144-148.
Winters,Clyde Ahmad, "Review of Dr. Asko Parpolas' "The Coming of
the Aryans". International Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 18, no2
(1989) , pages 98-127.
Winters, Clyde Ahmad, "The Dravido
Harappan Colonization of Central Asia", Central Asiatic Journal 34,
no1-2 (1990), pages 120-144.
1 comments:
I definitely think it's important to note the contributions of African people in the world's history, both objectively (just b/c world history is important) and politically (to destroy this false paradigm that "culture" is an indo-european invention, or that certain cultures are superior to others).
As a rogue linguist (& intermediate mandarin speaker) i definitely want to look more into possible cognates between mandarin chinese and mande/mandingo languages.
I just feel like a heading like "1st Chinese were Black" is _____???____ (i'm not sure) b/c the 1st everybody were black, since human life (and pre-human life) as we know it began in Africa.
and i always feel less receptive to when people start breaking down into racial categories (negroid, mongoloid, caucasoid). I realize this info is dated from 1964, but race is not a biological reality. at best it's pseudo-scientific, at worst it's a completely baseless system used to justify propaganda & racism using circular reasoning.
Post a Comment